You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Going to Mars?

in Reflections14 days ago

The idea of one city on Mars is wrong, indeed it is dystopian, because the city government would have even more control over you than on Earth.

The most attractive aspect of Mars is the ability to "avoid Imperial entanglements" to start society again, very small with no government and only a very limited number of rules.

It is entirely possible for a small group of like-minded people (eg Hiveans) to start their own colony and be self sufficient in the basics: energy, air, water, food, shelter and trade with other communities and Earth for specialised goods.
Cryptocurrencies and decentralised blockchains like Hive provide building blocks.

Cheap and plentiful energy from Solar Power provides self-sufficiency.

Sort:  

Yes, it is dystopian, but I don't think it would be a true city at that point anyway - it would be a large factory. That is why the skills for roles would be important. The citizens would be employees of a sort.

Also, one city is too risky anyway - but it would make the post something it was not meant to be, to go too far into any of that :)

Can Bitcoin be mined on Mars? ;)

You would have latency issues mining main chain BTC on Mars but there would be Mars based Cryptos that were linked / wrapped to BTC.