You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Hand Me Down Forever

in Finance and Economy10 days ago

Two comments.

First, I'm in the business of making bread because people consume it, that's the purpose of bread. I still try to make it as filling and nutritious and healthy as possible. If I was in the business of bikes, I'd probably try to make the most sustainable and most lasting bike in the history - unfortunately, that is not sustainable in our current economic doctrine. I'd probably be starting a new business every 5 years. Or going turning everything into a subscription.

Second, an anecdote. One of the reasons the mother of my child was always mad at me was because I never bought new stuff for the little one. I had and have many friends with children that are just one or two years more than her, so I usually had more than enough clothes. I probably won't have to buy her new clothes until she turns 12, since my girlfriend's daughter is 14 now and well, at that age, clothes have a shorter "en vogue" cycle in comparison to their life-cycle. So I already have clothes for a 12 year old.
For Lily's mother though, buying new things was important. It was and is a symbol. Every time she spends time with her mom, Lily comes home with a lot of new (and mostly useless) stuff. Materialism is very common here, and if the region weren't so poor, Apple would make a lot more money.

Thank you for your post, as always, another interesting read.

Sort:  

unfortunately, that is not sustainable in our current economic doctrine

Precisely.

The economic model is twisted - especially if looking at it in terms of environmental sustainability. It shouldn't be user pays for sustainable products, it should be that businesses pay for not providing sustainable products Unsustainable should be priced out of the market, and the way to profit should be to build sustainable. That is not the model now though, which is why fast fashion is so sticky.